<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Omnem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://omnem.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://omnem.com</link>
	<description>StatFreak, CyberDunker, AlternativeAdvertiser</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 04:14:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Has the 3rd Richest Campaign, EVER win an election ? by The Antagonist</title>
		<link>http://omnem.com/2010/09/has-the-3rd-richest-campaign-ever-win-an-election/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>The Antagonist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 04:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberdunk.com/omnem.com/?p=18#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Heh, you seem to fail to understand why this happens. 
You see, there is no conspiracy, no &quot;master plan&quot; as it were. The reason why this happens is cause the two candidates stand for two completely different ideologies, while the rest of the candidates are combinations of the ideas and beliefs of the two. So in truth, they are so well funded because they represent perfect opposites. It&#039;s like black fighting white (no pun intended hehe) while pitting them against any other candidate would be like having black vs gray or white vs gray. Sure there would be differences but not as big as in a black vs white confrontation, and the masses need to have a feeling that they are clearly supporting/opposing something and that the side they are picking has a rather extreme and definitive view regarding important matters.

To put it short, nobody would want to side with a party which has mixed feelings about things, people need to side with parties completely for or completely against something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, you seem to fail to understand why this happens.<br />
You see, there is no conspiracy, no &#8220;master plan&#8221; as it were. The reason why this happens is cause the two candidates stand for two completely different ideologies, while the rest of the candidates are combinations of the ideas and beliefs of the two. So in truth, they are so well funded because they represent perfect opposites. It&#8217;s like black fighting white (no pun intended hehe) while pitting them against any other candidate would be like having black vs gray or white vs gray. Sure there would be differences but not as big as in a black vs white confrontation, and the masses need to have a feeling that they are clearly supporting/opposing something and that the side they are picking has a rather extreme and definitive view regarding important matters.</p>
<p>To put it short, nobody would want to side with a party which has mixed feelings about things, people need to side with parties completely for or completely against something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

